background swath


Jay Powell’s Manic Monday

  • Contributors:
  • Stephen J. Douglass
Manic Monday

After two years of pandemic firsts, we thought we’d used the adjective “unprecedented” for the last time in this cycle. Then the Federal Reserve did something on Monday that we’ve never seen them do before: intentionally leak a monetary policy action through the financial press two days prior to a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. We don’t know exactly what happened behind the scenes, but it now seems clear that someone at the Fed called a number of financial journalists and signaled their intention to raise the federal funds rate by 75 basis points later today.

There have been instances in the past where certain journalists seemed to have an informed source on upcoming policy actions, but we cannot remember such a clear policy signal being communicated through the press, and certainly not during the Fed’s self-imposed pre-FOMC blackout period. This distinction is in contrast to foreign central banks, including the European Central Bank, which regularly leaks policy signals through the financial press.

The Fed is partly a victim of circumstance. The May CPI report that was released during the blackout period on Friday morning , showed a most unwelcome re-acceleration of inflation and directly contradicted the consensus view that inflation had peaked. Two separate surveys showing an increase in consumer inflation expectations further highlighted the risk. Financial markets responded immediately, with the 2-year Treasury yield increasing by 20 basis points on Friday and then another 20 on Monday morning. After the multiple press reports signaled the Fed’s leak on Monday afternoon, the 2-year yield had increased by a total of 55 basis points, which ties June 2008 as the largest 2-day increase since 1985 (Figure 1).

Inopportune timing notwithstanding, the Fed’s uncharacteristic behavior demonstrates that they recognize the gravity of their current predicament. Jay Powell means business. He is pulling out all the stops to prevent inflation expectations from de-anchoring. If the Fed has to choose between imposing a harsh recession today or allowing inflation expectations to de-anchor and then spending~25 years to restore their credibility, they will choose the recession every time.

They still hold out hope for a middle path where they can reduce inflation without imposing a recession and maintain their credibility throughout. That middle path grew a lot narrower with Friday’s CPI data. Powell’s actions this week made it clear: he’s willing to be as tough as Paul Volcker if the only alternative is to repeat the mistakes of Arthur Burns.

Despite all of the excitement over the past few days, we conclude with two optimistic observations (lest we be accused of fear-mongering).

First, long- and even medium-term inflation expectations remain well anchored. It is still fair to describe the Fed’s actions as a pre-emptive strike to prevent a de-anchoring of inflation expectations, rather than a corrective action to restore credibility. Surely the risk of de-anchoring is higher today than it’s been in decades, but we reject claims that the Fed has already lost their credibility. The TIPS and inflation swap markets are currently pricing year-over-year headline CPI to decline to 7.8% by December, 5.3% by April, and 3.30% by November 2023. These markets have just as bad of a forecasting record as everyone else in the past year, so we wouldn’t put a ton of weight behind these point forecasts, but we can say that every available market-based measure of long-run inflation expectations remains well-anchored. The 5-year / 5-year forward breakeven inflation rate, and indeed every 1-year forward beyond 2025, are at or below levels consistent with the Fed’s 2% core PCE inflation target.

Second, with the 2-year yield higher by 55 basis points in two days, we take it as a positive sign that the 30-year yield increased rather than decreased during the same period. The 2s30s curve has flattened to zero which surely signals elevated recession risks, but it has not inverted significantly in the past few days as you might fear in response to a hawkish policy shift of these historic proportions. Treasury market participants seem to be expressing the view that the roughly 250 basis points of rate hikes priced in the next four meetings is an appropriate response by the troubling CPI data, rather than a policy mistake that will cause a recession.

Given the degree of overheating in the U.S. economy today, avoiding a recession might simply be too much to ask. Indeed there has never been a time in postwar U.S. history when CPI inflation was above 4% and the unemployment rate was below 5% that was not followed by a recession within in the next two years. If the Fed is able to pull a rabbit out of the hat in this instance, we’ll relish the opportunity to use “unprecedented” one last time.

Jay Powells Manic Monday

Jay Powells Manic Monday

Download File

Disclaimer: By accepting this material, you acknowledge, understand and accept the following:

This material has been prepared by NISA Investment Advisors, LLC (“NISA”). This material is subject to change without notice. This document is for information and illustrative purposes only. It is not, and should not be regarded as “investment advice” or as a “recommendation” regarding a course of action, including without limitation as those terms are used in any applicable law or regulation. This information is provided with the understanding that with respect to the material provided herein (i) NISA is not acting in a fiduciary or advisory capacity under any contract with you, or any applicable law or regulation, (ii) that you will make your own independent decision with respect to any course of action in connection herewith, as to whether such course of action is appropriate or proper based on your own judgment and your specific circumstances and objectives, (iii) that you are capable of understanding and assessing the merits of a course of action and evaluating investment risks independently, and (iv) to the extent you are acting with respect to an ERISA plan, you are deemed to represent to NISA that you qualify and shall be treated as an independent fiduciary for purposes of applicable regulation. NISA does not purport to and does not, in any fashion, provide tax, accounting, actuarial, recordkeeping, legal, broker/dealer or any related services. You should consult your advisors with respect to these areas and the material presented herein. You may not rely on the material contained herein. NISA shall not have any liability for any damages of any kind whatsoever relating to this material. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner, in whole or in part, without the written permission of NISA except for your internal use. This material is being provided to you at no cost and any fees paid by you to NISA are solely for the provision of investment management services pursuant to a written agreement. All of the foregoing statements apply regardless of (i) whether you now currently or may in the future become a client of NISA and (ii) the terms contained in any applicable investment management agreement or similar contract between you and NISA.

Agree to Terms

Please review and accept the following to proceed. I have read and agree to the Terms of Use, Disclaimer, PSRX Disclaimer and Privacy Policy. I am either (i) an investment professional and an employee of an institutional investor, or a consultant to an institutional investor, or (ii) an employee of, or a student in, an institution of higher learning and I am involved in the study, research or teaching of subjects related to investments, finance, or economics. I reside in the United States or Canada. I understand that the information is not and should not be regarded as investment advice or as a recommendation regarding a course of action. By clicking “Accept” below, you hereby acknowledge, understand and accept the foregoing.