Perspectives

What a Difference a Decade Makes!

shutterstock_527098861

While the COVID-19 crisis is certainly new for everyone, heightened volatility, a declining equity market, falling rates and widening credit spreads are not.  So although funded status has fallen this time around, as compared to the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), plans have been better positioned to weather the storm.

The NISA PSRX index is structured to estimate the average funded status volatility of the top 100 U.S. corporate defined benefit plans.[1]  Plans have de-risked materially since the GFC; equities allocations have decreased and hedge ratios have increased.  At the end of March, the PSRX volatility level stood at 8.7%.  By comparison, this index level as of 12/31/2008 was 19%. While market volatility was partially a driver of higher funded status volatility, a higher equity allocation also contributed to those levels.

The PSRX index uses asset allocations from company 10-Ks.  As of fiscal year 2007, the last annual reporting period prior to the GFC, the average return-seeking asset allocation was 68%.  As of fiscal year 2018, the return seeking asset allocation had fallen to 45%, nearly 20 percentage points lower than a decade ago!  As a “What if experiment” we examined the 70 plans that were included in the PSRX during both the GFC and today. Those plans had an average funded status of 90% as of December 2019 and experienced a decline of 6 percentage points in funded status through March 2020.  If those same plans had entered this crisis with their 2007 asset allocation, we estimate that funded status would have fallen by 12 percentage points or double the estimate of the actual deterioration!

As one would guess this indicates Funded Status Volatility (FSV) has materially declined across plan sponsors.  Furthermore, the distribution of those funded status volatilities is materially different across plans.  Using current market volatilities and plan funded statuses, but comparing 2007 allocations to current asset allocations, the average FSV reduction is 4.5 percentage points.  Notably, only 4 plans (out of 70) experienced an increase in volatility.

The increase in the spread of the distribution between 2007 allocation and today isn’t surprising. Prior to the GFC (and adoption of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA)), plan objectives, asset allocation and interest rate hedge strategies tended to be more similar.  Now, depending on plan circumstances, an array of different factors drives asset allocation decisions and, accordingly, can lead to much different outcomes.

If we compare the performance of these plans during Q1-2020 based on their 2007 asset allocation, versus their 2018 asset allocation, over 90% of plans performed better based on their 2018 asset allocation.  For more than 25% of plans, the change in asset allocation resulted in an improvement in funded status by over 10 percentage points year to date. (By improvement, we mean less negative outcome in funded status.) When put in context of the size of the 70 liabilities, this translates to an additional $71b in funded status versus the outcome using 2008 asset allocations.

While a plan sponsor can’t control the market, they can control asset allocation.  It is evident from these results that actions taken by sponsors over the past decade prepared their plans for the crisis and put them in a better position to weather a market downturn.

Originally published on May 4, 2020. Revised on May 14, 2020.

[1] Data taken from NISA’s PSRX® Index Data which is based on the 100 largest pension plans, as determined by NISA based on publicly available information. The PSRX Index is a forward-looking estimate of the funded status volatility of U.S. corporate defined benefit pension plans. Asset allocation data is collected annually on the largest U.S. corporate pension plans. Keep in mind the PSRX uses generic assumptions based upon data only available in plan sponsors 10-Ks. Specific fixed income allocations, use of overlay strategies, and alternative asset allocations can drive differences. The levels for the PSRX, sector indices and Pension Risk Calculator include data for periods prior to when the index was in live production. Historical levels for the index prior to live production in September 2012 are calculated using the same methodology. Past market experience is not necessarily indicative of future market experience.

For more information on the PSRX Index go to: www.nisa.com/resources/psrx.

Disclaimer: By accepting this material, you acknowledge, understand and accept the following:

This material has been prepared by NISA Investment Advisors, LLC (“NISA”). This material is subject to change without notice. This document is for information and illustrative purposes only. It is not, and should not be regarded as “investment advice” or as a “recommendation” regarding a course of action, including without limitation as those terms are used in any applicable law or regulation. This information is provided with the understanding that with respect to the material provided herein (i) NISA is not acting in a fiduciary or advisory capacity under any contract with you, or any applicable law or regulation, (ii) that you will make your own independent decision with respect to any course of action in connection herewith, as to whether such course of action is appropriate or proper based on your own judgment and your specific circumstances and objectives, (iii) that you are capable of understanding and assessing the merits of a course of action and evaluating investment risks independently, and (iv) to the extent you are acting with respect to an ERISA plan, you are deemed to represent to NISA that you qualify and shall be treated as an independent fiduciary for purposes of applicable regulation. NISA does not purport to and does not, in any fashion, provide tax, accounting, actuarial, recordkeeping, legal, broker/dealer or any related services. You should consult your advisors with respect to these areas and the material presented herein. You may not rely on the material contained herein. NISA shall not have any liability for any damages of any kind whatsoever relating to this material. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner, in whole or in part, without the written permission of NISA except for your internal use. This material is being provided to you at no cost and any fees paid by you to NISA are solely for the provision of investment management services pursuant to a written agreement. All of the foregoing statements apply regardless of (i) whether you now currently or may in the future become a client of NISA and (ii) the terms contained in any applicable investment management agreement or similar contract between you and NISA.

Agree to Terms

Please review and accept the following to proceed.

I have read and agree to the Terms of Use, Disclaimer, PSRX Disclaimer, and Privacy Policy. I am either (i) an investment professional and an employee of an institutional investor, or a consultant to an institutional investor, or (ii) an employee of, or a student in, an institution of higher learning and I am involved in the study, research or teaching of subjects related to investments, finance, or economics. I reside in the United States or Canada. I understand that the information is not and should not be regarded as investment advice or as a recommendation regarding a course of action.

By clicking “Accept” below, you hereby acknowledge, understand and accept the foregoing.